Asia’s satellite sector is entering a transformative phase, defined by fragmentation, fast‑moving competition and rising geopolitical pressure. As new capacity floods the region and national priorities sharpen, operators face fundamental questions about their roles in a rapidly reshaping market.
Read our top four takeaways from our conversation with Nathan de Ruiter, partner and managing director at Novaspace, or listen to the full episode.
Takeaway 1: Asia’s satellite sector is still highly fragmented.
The supply-demand balance for satellite capacity in Asia is shifting but remains uneven across the region due to its fragmented structure and differing national conditions.
“We tend to look at Asia as a single supply-demand market but, in reality, it’s a collection of highly fragmented national markets – each shaped by its own regulatory environment, economic conditions and national policy,” de Ruiter said.
The region has historically been relatively late in building high-throughput capacity, which has contributed to periods of undersupply compared with other major markets, de Ruiter said.
That balance is now shifting as new capacity enters the market, including recent launches and continued expansion of LEO systems, he said. “Even in 2025, when we look at the statistics, the region itself accounts for only 60% of the GEO supply compared to North America – despite having about twice the land mass,” he said.
LEO deployment is also shaking up supply dynamics, though access remains uneven across countries depending on availability and regulatory approval, with Starlink accounting for most of the current availability across the region, said de Ruiter.
“This is why you need to look at it on a country-by-country basis because when you look at where Starlink is present today, it’s about 29 of the close to 50 countries in APAC, so there are still significant gaps in where that capacity can be used,” de Ruiter said.
Takeaway 2: China’s growth is reshaping competition and optionality in Asia.
China’s expansion of satellite and LEO capabilities is beginning to reshape the competitive dynamics across Asia’s space sector, creating both pressure and new openings for regional operators.
The growth of Chinese constellations is expected to weigh on competition and, eventually, pricing – even if the final pricing models are still uncertain as deployments mature, de Ruiter said. At the same time, the expansion of these constellations is widening the set of options available to operators in the region, granting them more flexibility in how they structure capacity and partnerships, he said.
For example, MEASAT in Malaysia first became one of Starlink’s early resellers in the country before becoming the first international partner of China’s Thousand Sails Constellation, reflecting how operators are positioning themselves across multiple ecosystems rather than committing to a single provider, de Ruiter said.
“Obviously, you can see it as a competition…but let’s take a positive spin here – it also becomes this optionality for them to benefit from those new capabilities coming to the markets,” he said.
Takeaway 3: APAC operators are facing an identity crisis.
Operators across the APAC region are being pushed to clarify their long-term identities as the region’s satellite sector expands, said de Ruiter.
As the market grows, companies are increasingly having to define what they are and what role they want to play in the satellite sector, de Ruiter said.
“This really gets to the heart of the issue faced by satellite operators in Asia today – many of them are going through what I sometimes call effectively a ‘mid-life crisis.’ They’re asking themselves: ‘Who are we? Are we a regional satellite operator? Are we a managed service provider? Are we a national space tech champion?’ They’ll have to make the decision on this identity question, and that will really determine how the competitive landscape will shape up over the next few years,” he said.
Despite the weight of these strategic questions, the broader market remains robust, with enough momentum and unmet demand to support several operators as they chart their individual courses, de Ruiter said.
Takeaway 4: The ground segment is becoming a geopolitical asset.
Satellite operators are directing much of their ground segment modernization toward software rather than hardware, as multi-orbit architectures place new demands on coordination and network management, said de Ruiter. With LEO, MEO and GEO systems expected to function as a unified service layer, operators are investing in orchestration, automation and dynamic traffic management tools that can route and allocate capacity in real time, he said.
The shift reflects a broader recognition that raw bandwidth alone is no longer enough. As operators add more capacity, the value increasingly depends on how effectively networks can be coordinated from the ground, de Ruiter said. Ground infrastructure is evolving from a support function into the system that manages traffic flows, aggregates links and enables integrated service delivery across orbital layers, he said. Automation has also become central to that effort, allowing operators to scale complex networks without driving up costs, he said.
In Asia, modernization efforts are unfolding alongside growing regulatory and sovereignty pressures, de Ruiter noted. Countries including India and Vietnam are tightening requirements around where data can be processed and stored, pushing operators toward localized gateways instead of relying on regional teleports, de Ruiter said. Asian governments are also seeking greater control over communications infrastructure, a shift de Ruiter said is turning the ground segment into “not just a technical or strategic asset but also a geopolitical one.”
For more, listen to the full episode.
Explore More:
APAC’s Starlink: Taiwan Proposes Regional LEO Collaboration
What’s in Store at Space Industry Forum
APAC’s 2026 Space Marketplace
