Not long ago, vertical integration was seen as a risky bet in the space sector, with only a handful of companies managing to turn it into market advantage. But as the industry has matured and sovereign demand has grown, space firms are reshaping their strategies and scaling their services in new ways.
The first quarter of 2026 saw a record $8 billion in global SpaceTech investment, driven largely by the anticipated SpaceX IPO, according to a June report by venture capital firm Generation Space, the U.S. division of Seraphim Space. Emerging business cases such as orbital data centers, powered by AI demand, are also expanding the space sector’s total addressable market, according to the report.
Space has Become Stabilized … and Critical.
The recent rise in fundraising and M&A activity indicates that investors view the space industry as entering a more mature phase, driven by several structural shifts, space economy strategist Kelli Kedis Ogborn, told Constellations.
Reusable launch vehicles have reduced the cost and variability of accessing orbit by roughly an order of magnitude. This has transformed the sector from a high-risk, custom-engineering environment into one with standardized, predictable inputs, Kedis Ogborn said. As a result, constellation-scale architectures are now economically viable, and companies can rely on fixed launch costs when modeling markets and unit economics, she said.
The current acceleration, however, stems primarily from revenue stability, Kedis Ogborn noted. The industry has progressed from demonstrating capability to generating recurring income through multi-year government contracts and expanding commercial customer bases. This transition from milestone-based progress to consistent cash flow enables investors to model returns with far greater certainty, she said. In parallel, sovereign demand has become a durable market anchor, as governments increasingly classify space as critical infrastructure and commit to long-term funding, she said.
Technical, commercial and geopolitical factors all play a role in the uptick in space investment and M&A activity, with geopolitical being the most influential factor, Nathan de Ruiter, partner and managing director at Novaspace, told Constellations.
“First and foremost, space is no longer considered an adjacent technology sector. It’s [now] critical national infrastructure and an integral part of national security,” de Ruiter said. “So I think that’s a big shift.”
Sovereign Needs Create Durable Buyers
Part of the shift is the push for sovereign space, which is motivating nations from Europe to Africa and the Middle East to the APAC region to own space assets, de Ruiter explained.
“They’re all looking develop and acquire or build their own sovereign capability. So that’s a big, big driver,” he said.
“Sovereign demand put a floor under the market, de-risking the demand side in a way that proves a durable buyer. Governments now treat space as critical infrastructure, with U.S. budgets funded through 2029 and Europe rearming,” —Kelli Kedis Ogborn
“Sovereign demand put a floor under the market, de-risking the demand side in a way that proves a durable buyer. Governments now treat space as critical infrastructure, with U.S. budgets funded through 2029 and Europe rearming,” added Kedis Ogborn.
The rise in sovereign-capability efforts stems from governments recognizing how strategically central commercial space has become to avoiding dependence on external infrastructure, Kedis Ogborn said. “Nations took note of the need for resiliency and redundancy,” she said.
For companies, sovereign relevance hinges on two things: delivering a capability a state views as essential and being structured so the government can reliably work with it. That includes trusted ownership, supply chains without adversary exposure, the clearances and security posture for sensitive work, and the ability to operate and contract at national scale, Kedis Ogborn said. “Serving the need makes you useful but being compatible makes you dependable,” and real strategic value lies where those factors meet, she said.
A company that can credibly meet national-security or resilience needs gains a stable demand floor that attracts both investors and acquirers, Kedis Ogborn said. Sovereign markets also increasingly support multiple providers to prevent single-vendor lock-in, which means even subscale firms can become fundable simply because the state wants a viable alternative. In today’s environment, strategic importance isn’t limited to top performers; it often comes from being the trusted second source, she said.
Space sovereignty is no longer just a national issue, according to a June 10 report by the World Economic Forum. Allies now combine their capabilities, commercial players acquire their own autonomous communications networks, regional groups negotiate reserved capacity, and satellite operators integrate more of their supply chains to limit outside dependence, according to the report.
Once a nation or regional bloc builds sovereign space assets, it generally continues to fund or grow them, creating a stable baseline of demand. When alliances become less cohesive, that demand increases further because partners seek to reduce strategic reliance on one another, the report said.
After these systems are deployed, buyers must keep investing in cybersecurity, ground-segment modernization, interoperability and backup capacity, which transforms what begins as a single acquisition into a long-term procurement commitment, the report said.
Additionally, governments are spending more on defense and incorporating more space capabilities into their defense programs, said de Ruiter.
“Naturally, we see some of those contracts and spending toward the space sector and I think that’s what investors kind of appreciate. They see that the government has always been kind of your ‘AAA customer’ — very secure,” de Ruiter said. “And if the government is spending more … that creates a positive view for the investors in the sector and hence, you see all this fundraising going significantly up.”
“Put simply: cheap launch made the sector possible, commercial maturation made it investable, and sovereign demand made it a safer bet,” Kedis Ogborn said.
Scalable, Service-Driven Industry
SpaceX’s recent IPO also signals that the space industry is much more mature and scalable than it was a few years ago, de Ruiter said, echoing Kedis Ogborn.
Historically, companies only focused on a single layer of the space value chain, but that’s changed over the past few years with more companies pursuing vertical integration, he said.
“SpaceX has been the pioneer around that. And I think what they demonstrated is a number of benefits this full control.” — Nathan de Ruiter
“SpaceX has been the pioneer around that. And I think what they demonstrated is a number of benefits this full control,” he said.
The first advantage is the ability to iterate and deploy technology much more quickly. A vertically integrated company can significantly refresh its tech without being slowed down by long procurement cycles with external partners, de Ruiter said. It also improves the economics — by removing intermediaries, companies keep greater control over their margins, which can lead to real cost efficiencies when executed well. And on top of that, it gives the companies full control over the products and experiences delivered to its end customers, he said.
Recent industry consolidation, such as Amazon Leo’s buy of Globalstar and Rocket Lab’s acquisition of Iridium, reflect a shift in market priorities, noted Kedis Ogborn.
“The signal is that the market is valuing space companies based on the stack, and less by the layer and capability they provide to the ecosystem,” —Kelli Kedis Ogborn
“The signal is that the market is valuing space companies based on the stack, and less by the layer and capability they provide to the ecosystem,” Kedis Ogborn said.
“For years the sector was priced piece by piece — a launch company, an operator, a spectrum holder, each on its own multiple. These deals say the whole is now worth more than the sum with control of the full value chain because integration compresses the time from deployment to revenue and keeps margin from leaking to counterparties at every handoff,” she said.
Owning the Full Value Chain
Integration allows a buyer to run several independent revenue lines on the same infrastructure, turning a single-market company into a diversified one. This helps move away from the contract-dependent revenue model that has long made space businesses difficult to scale and finance, Kedis Ogborn said. When Amazon invests to complete its vertical stack and Rocket Lab invests to add a global network and spectrum to its launch-and-manufacturing foundation, both are betting on the same idea: owning the full value chain is more advantageous than excelling at just one part of it, she said.
Beneath that, both deals highlight that value is concentrating around scarcity. Each hinge on spectrum rights and an existing customer base — assets that cannot simply be built, Kedis Ogborn said.
“Spectrum is the only major input in this industry you can’t manufacture. You can build more rockets and more satellites, but the radio frequencies are finite and licensed, and demand from mega-constellations has outrun the supply of exclusive, protected bands,” —Kelli Kedis Ogborn
“Spectrum is the only major input in this industry you can’t manufacture. You can build more rockets and more satellites, but the radio frequencies are finite and licensed, and demand from mega-constellations has outrun the supply of exclusive, protected bands,” she said. “As the system shifts to spectrum sharing and dynamic management, value starts to concentrate in owning scarce harmonized spectrum rights, and out-managing everyone else in shared spectrum.”
“The ownership side is quietly the real engine of the M&A wave,” Kedis Ogborn continued. “Because you can’t easily acquire new harmonized spectrum and buying the company that holds it is often the only path as we saw with Amazon acquiring Globalstar and Rocket Lab acquiring Iridium.”
There are a lot of deals today built fundamentally around spectrum, noted de Ruiter, agreeing with Kedis Ogborn. It’s becoming one of the most important strategic assets in the sector, de Ruiter said. Whether you’re talking about direct-to-device services, broader consolidation, or advanced communications, usable spectrum is the scarce commodity everyone is trying to secure, and many companies involved in recent M&A deals have been quite aggressive about securing this asset, he said.
“The defensible value sits in the chokepoints — harmonized spectrum, assured access, etc.— while raw capacity is drifting toward commodity,” Kedis Ogborn said.
This point is also well illustrated by Rocket Lab’s strategy — including their move to acquire Iridium, de Ruiter noted. Their goal was to gain access to the applications layer, where most of the service value is ultimately created, and to build a more direct relationship with customers, he said. Instead of focusing solely on hardware, they’re shifting toward a business model with a stronger services component, he said.
From the perspective of upstream manufacturers, moving downstream is becoming a major trend. Rocket Lab is one example, and York is another company following a similar path. Increasingly, more companies are pursuing this direction, de Ruiter said.
“It’s going to be very important because you can really scale your business,” de Ruiter said. “More spectrum means the better service or the more and or the more customers you can serve.”
Mapping the Consolidation Outlook
As sovereign-space priorities, spectrum pressures and software-centric architectures reshape the industry, de Ruiter expects consolidation to concentrate in three areas. In Earth-observation analytics, many small firms still own compelling datasets, creating openings for larger integrated platforms that can scale commercially and operationally, de Ruiter said. In manufacturing, U.S. and European players are already expanding their geographic footprint to capture rising demand, he said. And in the ground segment, which remains highly fragmented, virtualization and emerging standards are lowering technical risk and making scale, customer access and both horizontal and vertical integration major drivers of new investment and M&A, de Ruiter said.
The next wave of consolidation will move toward parts of the industry defined by scarcity—sovereign access, limited spectrum and the software-centric architectures that increasingly determine who wins, said Kedis Ogborn. These pressures often conflict, with sovereignty favoring closed systems, spectrum sharing rewarding openness and software pushing toward interoperability, Kedis Ogborn said. “The companies that come out ahead are the ones that resolve those tensions in their own favor,” she said.
Consolidation is likely to cluster first around spectrum and then around the software and data layers that control customer ownership, Kedis Ogborn said. This will hit the middle of the value chain: sub-scale operators with valuable spectrum or customers but no path to full vertical integration, and specialist software or ground-segment providers that integrators prefer to acquire rather than rely on, she said.
“The likely endgame is a smaller number of vertically integrated, sovereign-aligned primes, with independents surviving only where they’re either genuinely differentiated software plays or too specialized to bother acquiring,” she said.
Explore More:
Beyond Connectivity: Rocket Lab’s Iridium Deal Signals a New Era of Space Consolidation
Take-Private Deals Are Reshaping Digital Infrastructure, While Space Companies Look to IPOs To Support Growth
Iridium CEO on How He Approached a Possible Sale of the Company, and Why Rocket Lab Is the Best Fit
